Colonic distention at screening CT colonography: role of spasmolytic agents and body habitus.

Sufficient colonic dilation is important when using CT colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer screening. We investigated the effect of antispasmodic agents and the patient body habitus on the degree of colonic dilation in screening CTC.We assessed the effect of clinical characteristics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and the presence of diverticula] and the use of antispasmodics on colonic distention in 140 patients who underwent CTC for colorectal cancer screening. The CTC was performed in both the supine- and prone positions. Seventy patients received antispasmodics prior to CT examination and the other 70 did not. Colonic distention was scored using a 5-point scale: 1=collapsed, 2=poorly visualized, 3=visualized but underdistended, 4=acceptable, and 5=excellent. Images scored as 4 or 5 were considered to be of diagnostic quality. The mean visual evaluation score was significantly higher in the supine- than the prone position (4.2±0.5 vs. 4.0±0.5, p<0.01). For the supine position, only the use of antispasmodic was statistically associated with sufficient colonic dilation by univariate logistic analysis (odds ratio=2.365, p=0.03). For the prone position, age, BMI, and the use of antispasmodic were statistically associated with sufficient colonic dilation by multivariate analysis. The odds ratio of these parameters was 0.955 (p=0.02), 0.874 (p=0.03), and 2.391 (p=0.02), respectively.We obtained sufficient colonic dilation with an antispasmodic for CTC in both positions. Younger age and a lower BMI were also associated with better colonic dilation in the prone position.

Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions.

BACKGROUND: Although the screening of small, flat polyps is clinically important, the role of CT colonography (CTC) screening in their detection has not been thoroughly investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate the detection capability and usefulness of CTC in the screening of flat and polypoid lesions by comparing CTC with optic colonoscopy findings as the gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated the CTC detection capability for flat colorectal polyps with a flat surface and a height not exceeding 3 mm (n = 42) by comparing to conventional polypoid lesions (n = 418) according to the polyp diameter. Four types of reconstruction images including multiplanar reconstruction, volume rendering, virtual gross pathology, and virtual endoscopic images were used for visual analysis. We compared the abilities of the four reconstructions for polyp visualization. RESULTS: Detection sensitivity for flat polyps was 31.3%, 44.4%, and 87.5% for lesions measuring 2-3 mm, 4-5 mm, and ≥6 mm, respectively; the corresponding sensitivity for polypoid lesions was 47.6%, 79.0%, and 91.7%. The overall sensitivity for flat lesions (47.6%) was significantly lower than polypoid lesions (64.1%). Virtual endoscopic imaging showed best visualization among the four reconstructions. Colon cancers were detected in eight patients by optic colonoscopy, and CTC detected colon cancers in all eight patients. CONCLUSION: CTC using 64-row multidetector CT is useful for colon cancer screening to detect colorectal polyps while the detection of small, flat lesions is still challenging.

[Image quality and detection performance of a direct digital radiography system].

The physical characteristics of a direct amorphous Selenium (a-Se) digital fluoroscopy and radiography system were investigated. Pre-sampled modulation transfer functions (MTF) were measured using a slit method. Noise power spectra were determined for different input exposures by fast Fourier transform of uniformly exposed samples. The MTFs of direct digital radiography systems showed significantly higher values than those of indirect digital radiography and screen-film systems. The direct digital radiography systems showed higher noise levels compared with those of indirect systems under roughly the same exposure conditions. Contrast-detail analysis was performed to compare detection by direct digital radiography systems with that of the screen-film (FUJI HG-M2/UR2) systems. The average contrast-detail curves of digital and film images were obtained from the results of observation. Image quality figures (IQF) were also calculated from the individual observer performance tests. The results indicated that digital contrast-detail curves and IQF are, on average, are equal those of the screen-film system.